Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:54:07 +0300
From:      Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src ObsoleteFiles.inc UPDATING
Message-ID:  <20060122075406.GB91663@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <20060121233937.GC83922@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200601212251.k0LMpeom029908@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060121233937.GC83922@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 02:39:37AM +0300, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:51:40PM +0000, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Y> yar         2006-01-21 22:51:40 UTC
> Y> 
> Y>   FreeBSD src repository
> Y> 
> Y>   Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_6)
> Y>     .                    ObsoleteFiles.inc UPDATING 
> Y>   Log:
> Y>   MFC:
> Y>   Record renaming rc.d/ppp-user to rc.d/ppp.
> Y>   
> Y>   Revision    Changes    Path
> Y>   1.25.2.2    +2 -0      src/ObsoleteFiles.inc
> Y>   1.416.2.14  +5 -0      src/UPDATING
> 
> If I don't mistake, when this thins was committed to HEAD,
> someone noticed, that /etc is mergemaster's area, and
> files from /etc should not be listed in ObsoleteFiles.inc.

There are quite a few /etc files still listed in ObsoleteFiles.inc.
Was there a consensus on this issue?  In my opinion, mergemaster
just predated ObsoleteFiles.inc in this area.  We are trying to
make /etc contents uniform across different installations, with
local configuration files going to /usr/local/etc, so there's nothing
wrong in listing defunct /etc files in ObsoleteFiles.inc.

-- 
Yar



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060122075406.GB91663>