Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 20:30:49 -0700 From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <chad@shire.net> To: Robert Marella <hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com> Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <7D9CA83A-7CA6-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <1108179120.46376.27.camel@p4> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AE6@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <420D669A.20000@incubus.de> <1108179120.46376.27.camel@p4>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 11, 2005, at 8:32 PM, Robert Marella wrote: > On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 03:14 +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote: >> Johnson David wrote: >> >>> Currently Windows rules the desktop world, even for diehard Unix >>> shops. But >>> that will not last forever. We need to start thinking about the >>> desktop >>> today. We need to stop the official discouragement of desktop >>> FreeBSD. >> >> MacOS X is the "Desktop BSD". It is available today, and it works >> better than anything else at being a "desktop". > > Does it work on my intel hardware? Not in public it doesn't. That is irrelevant to the discussion. FreeBSD does not work on my PPC HW either. Chad
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7D9CA83A-7CA6-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC>