Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 07:00:14 +1000 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: kpielorz@tdx.co.uk (Karl Pielorz) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM changes broke SYSVSHM? Message-ID: <199805032100.HAA14880@cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <354C5194.8D8986B8@tdx.co.uk> from Karl Pielorz at "May 3, 98 12:14:28 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Karl Pielorz wrote: > Very true, but it's still amazing the amount of people I see who say "I'm > running 3.0 on our [production] server...", very scary ;-) This is NOT the case. I was referring to normal development work on -current. People complain about not having better thread support. People complain about developers not testing things before committing them. Well if the committers themselves can't run -current, what do they do? Commit anyway? Delay commits for a month? -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805032100.HAA14880>