Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:46:34 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: andrews@technologist.com Cc: mckusick@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/contrib/softupdates softdep.h ffs_softdep.c Message-ID: <86g0q6gw5x.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:33:09 -0400" <20000621223309.G47446@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <200006220029.RAA97417@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000621223309.G47446@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:33:09 -0400,
Will wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 05:29:54PM -0700, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> > Modified files:
> > sys/contrib/softupdates softdep.h ffs_softdep.c
> > Log:
> > Update to new copyright.
>
> Does this mean we can now include softupdates in GENERIC? And further,
> is it practical to do this? I have it enabled on all filesystems on my
> local machines and have rarely (if ever) had problems directly related
> to softupdates.
Yes, it has been working quite stably here too. Besides, one must do
a "tunefs -n enable" for every partition that he or she wants to do
softupdates anyway, so just adding the support for softupdates to the
GENERIC kernel won't hurt anyone who don't want to turn that feature
on by default, except a little code increase.
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org
"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86g0q6gw5x.wl>