Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:58:40 -0600 From: Karl Denninger <karl@Denninger.Net> To: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp>, Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: jfesler@gigo.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAO Integration? Message-ID: <19981210225840.A98886@Denninger.Net> In-Reply-To: <199812110452.NAA04025@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp>; from NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa on Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 01:52:18PM %2B0900 References: <199812110220.TAA65513@harmony.village.org> <199812110452.NAA04025@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 11, 1998 at 01:52:18PM +0900, NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa wrote: > > Solaris 2.4 or 2.5 was the first to support soft power off, if I > > recall correctly. In the timeline of unix, that can hardly be called > > "traditional." :-) > > On SONY NEWS old WS, NEWS-OS 4.x support power-off by "shutdown -x". > That OS is based on 4.3BSD. > > At least, "halt" and "power-off" is different mean on traditional UNIX. Uh, excuse me, but the NeXT machines were soft power-off. Including the first NeXT cubes. If you can count MACH as Unix, these qualify. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981210225840.A98886>