Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 19:29:40 -0700 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2-STABLE Message-ID: <199708270229.TAA10102@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: Ron Bickers <rbickers@intercenter.net> "Re: 2.2-STABLE" (Aug 26, 9:01pm)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 26, 9:01pm, Ron Bickers wrote: } Subject: Re: 2.2-STABLE } } Would someone who knows more about the label "FreeBSD-stable" include the } details on where it comes from in the FreeBSD-stable section of the } handbook? There may be less confusion over where this "stable" branch } (that isn't actually named 'stable') is found. Sound reasonable? I think it would also lessen confusion to split this list, since there are now 2.1-stable and 2.2-stable branches. Folks often send messages here saying they're running -stable, but they don't specify which one. --- Truck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708270229.TAA10102>