Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 02:01:16 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: doreti() and userret() Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201200157420.5016-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201200121570.5016-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
replying to mself again: On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > See sys.dif.gz in ~bde on freefall. > > A lot of cosmetic changes there amongst the real changes.. > I notice that you are reversing people's work of gradually > getting rid of K&R function declarations. This is opposite to what we > are doing as a group. (converting functions to ansi declarations > as we hit them). And I see this change, which is also reverse of where we are going: - u_int32_t en_mxcsr; /* SSE sontorol/status register */ - u_int32_t en_pad2; /* padding */ + u_int en_mxcsr; /* SSE sontorol/status register */ + u_int en_pad2; /* padding */ I thought that for hardware defined fields we were using the explicit size definitions wherever possible? (saves having to try remember which machine you are working on... and now that there are posix defined names for these... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0201200157420.5016-100000>