Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 May 2003 13:53:18 -0700
From:      David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Farid Hajji <me@farid-hajji.de>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Are snapshots always consistent?
Message-ID:  <20030512205318.GA3573@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <200305100055.37190.me@farid-hajji.de>
References:  <200305100055.37190.me@farid-hajji.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 10, 2003, Farid Hajji wrote:
> I'm somewhat confused about snapshots.
> 
> Are snapshots (e.g. created with dump -L) supposed to
> be always in a consistent state?

Yes.

> What happens if a snapshot is taken, while background
> fsck is fixing a filesystem?

fsck creates its own snapshot of the filesystem and analyzes the
snapshot, so nothing bad should happen.  fsck's snapshot will show
up as a zero-length file in dump's snapshot.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030512205318.GA3573>