Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 16:58:33 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/BBMan Makefile ports/chinese/CJK Makefile ports/chinese/arnettf Makefile ports/chinese/arphicttf Makefile ports/chinese/auto-tw-l10n Makefile ports/chinese/bg5pdf Makefile ports/chinese/big5fs Makefile ports/chinese/chinput3 ... Message-ID: <2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050108155045.568E716A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050108155045.568E716A4D0@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========9F31DCBAA797D2FD045B========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline +-le 08/01/2005 15:50 +0000, Sergey Matveychuk =E9crivait : | Log: | - Pass maintainership to submitter I fail to see the point of such a commit, I mean, without any update to the ports. Giving a port to someone making an update is good, but giving a whole bunch of ports just for giving them is doing no good I think. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --==========9F31DCBAA797D2FD045B========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iQEVAwUBQeADKlvROjYJ63c1AQLIUgf/ceV+vZoKcMKKh8alCF8GPtJ6eHGRp4xj dHm3GZnXIG9UW9h/GyfCahmjQUw5kOIbMfnSP72bDKvZins4ooXDy4KeclGkTwx4 k0tSRaEQjHct2sfXKTlZpDlSkClRM18fahsLuzeqO6wwO5DD/mKi7qD7ktpfBi6z IM1oB29Wn+c7QVw/oTfDsTXsDkNRq7DvwYB/bBqBsCTF2QkWFejKLM69HbLPaiyj 5ATNSkmRJnsyBd1C89XHFAcwTqltJ++S320VvtWXB9Uap75eThMwXHFDEOf5YODq V5TlFJfl+v2tem6LqOsA+ptWjVFhoGpPsRbfmphmxZi/oAkRmkrXhA== =UKqu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========9F31DCBAA797D2FD045B==========--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE>