Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 17:41:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245178] graphics/mesa-dri no member named 'CGFT_ObjectFile' Message-ID: <bug-245178-7141-sBJMnplx02@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245178-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245178-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245178 Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbeich@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #9 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Niclas Zeising from comment #8) > There are runtime issues with later llvm versions Then it should be using IGNORE=3D or BROKEN=3D instead of quietly dragging-= in an entire new compiler suit :-( For all we know, these unidentified "issues" may have been solved upstream already -- but, with the current "work around", we're unlikely to ever know= ... There is also a simple rule of thumb: if your port can only be built with a particular compiler, then the underlying code is broken... Years ago, the then-maintainer of OpenOffice.org created lang/gcc-ooo -- a version of gcc intended solely for building OpenOffice. It was ridiculous then, and it rem= ains ridiculous today... At any rate, the proposed patch allows the code to compile with llvm10, if = the compiler is ever allowed to run. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245178-7141-sBJMnplx02>