Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 12:53:44 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <4FD47CB8.8090707@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838gS7L=Sy9Giow1gYMtM2n4NnoHJWm8p3ZCvi6CZbMWhg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <20120604110339.GA9426@equilibrium.bsdes.net> <CAOjkAUe0_U==vjQGO77sQy=4JJ_e_ypoGpVbf1Mg62ttXATJYw@mail.gmail.com> <4FD2D4CC.3080109@ateamsystems.com> <4FD3003C.4080109@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD352FF.9090101@ateamsystems.com> <4FD357F2.9090901@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4FD35905.9080500@ateamsystems.com> <20120610121210.3ce1bd9d@zelda.sugioarto.com> <CADLo838gS7L=Sy9Giow1gYMtM2n4NnoHJWm8p3ZCvi6CZbMWhg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5D54188FD2930AE8B4A150A8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/10/12 12:37, Chris Rees wrote: > On 10 June 2012 11:12, Martin Sugioarto <martin@sugioarto.com> wrote: >> Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:09:09 +0700 >> schrieb Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com>: >> >>> I get the feeling people are updating their ports tree and then >>> recompiling/reinstalling everything "just because" and then are >>> complaining when one thing breaks (its the only thing I can think of)= =2E >> >> Hi. >> >> But it does not need to break. Sometimes it would be enough just to >> test if the port compiles before committing it (I'm talking about >> libreoffice here which is broken). Some people rely on some essential >> ports. I can understand that porters are not Gods and make errors, but= >> they should be fixed within hours, when they have been found on >> important ports. >> >> I mean, ports collection is sure great and this is one of the aspects >> why I am using FreeBSD, but at the moment FreeBSD is losing strength >> here, in my opinion. >=20 > Er... people always test their commits. Sometimes edge cases will Really "always"? This is a statement you can only speak for yourself and in any other case, it is good-will thinking about what others should do! > creep in, such as the libreoffice failure which was due to different > configurations, but to suggest that the commit wasn't tested is quite > frankly insulting-- it built on a clean system perfectly well. >=20 > Chris --------------enig5D54188FD2930AE8B4A150A8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP1Hy4AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8LJAIAL2Zrk6m7ML4ExtInc4EcQX4 Z006yaPUcqtOv7sNG2d1ke581ryOivpZugtEOpX2YyYnuC9gxLHs/1JNd1cHcjLj aFFNoaU6gg7HZzVWgmV36fj6qykjin6T3FU89J4HmpsbWvJFZkRA7i2uRFkTK4Rk YcDl5Yh/BvZnt+jDGR6hm6nb2AwRJiHknk7UpeD583SCMsAwZ35tIaFjO50lPYgY 4j6eCgZ9KkSZjVmBsrE7+/Ndakn8aFRm8A9yT4fFKkSm1Upjg9RimDQaiGGH0vzf NXhpPwqRLOk9V8ffNxJE3Qgk+aSOnGy+WpZ2rkQjoP7KyPoQD+SGL3FR18+VguQ= =Nigg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5D54188FD2930AE8B4A150A8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FD47CB8.8090707>