Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:35:46 +1000 From: Da Rock <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation Message-ID: <4EFDB022.10904@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20111230071500.6de15cf4@scorpio> References: <CAGy-%2Bi-NN_SOYrrE6WgHyCBa5VzFexwT_C9UYhO3GyjvfsxpAA@mail.gmail.com> <20111230073958.3949a17b.freebsd@edvax.de> <20111230071500.6de15cf4@scorpio>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/30/11 22:15, Jerry wrote: > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:39:58 +0100 > Polytropon articulated: > >> However, there are differences in how you judge documentation >> to be _good_. Talk to a mainframer, and he will tell you a >> different story. Then talk to a "Windows" person and explain >> what documentation is, and he'll tell you that you don't >> need it. :-) > Poly, I think you just broke your own record for retarded statements. > If you were to expand your statement to include documentation for > drivers for "N" protocol devices, FreeBSD users would say that they > don't need it either since they don't have such drivers. The fact is > that Windows was designed to "just work" so that users could spend > their time on the project(s) they wanted to work on and not reading > tons of frivolous garbage on simple things like networking two or more > computers together. > > Poly, you have stated several times in a multitude of posts that you > neither use nor understand MS Windows. For most people, that alone > would preclude them from making a statement on said subject. Obviously, > talking about something you readily admit to having no knowledge about > is no problem for you. Pathetic. > > For your own info, I am compiling a list of totally contradictory > statements you have made in the past year or so and am planning on > including it into an article I am writing. And no, I don't need your > permission. You relinquished all rights once you posted them on a > publicly available forum. I all ready checked. Was this really necessary to post to the list? Publicly? Opinions are your own, but this does appear rather vindictive and not really wanted on a friendly list. For reference Polytropon has been rather helpful many times on this list regardless of how many faux pas maybe made; I'm sure you're not without fault either.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EFDB022.10904>