Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 06 Jun 2017 05:37:51 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 219767] [NEW PORT] devel/python-dateutil: Extensions to the standard Python datetime module
Message-ID:  <bug-219767-13-Hgj8HWSGCE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-219767-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-219767-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219767

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |matthew@FreeBSD.org
                   |org                         |
         Resolution|FIXED                       |Rejected
                 CC|                            |python@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #3 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
Assign to committer that resolved and use correct(er) resolution (FIXED mea=
ns
change made/committed).

This is a good example of why Python ports must be named exactly after their
upstream counterparts, ugly (py, python-) prefixes/suffixes and all.=20

Renaming py-dateutil has been on the todo list for a while but given the nu=
mber
of existing dependencies has taken a backseat.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219767-13-Hgj8HWSGCE>