Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:00:04 -0800 (PST) From: mi@video-collage.com To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Message-ID: <200003300200.SAA03060@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/12722; it has been noted by GNATS. From: mi@video-collage.com To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12722: New port: AT&T's DjVu library for scanned images Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:49:11 -0500 (EST) On 29 Mar, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: = * From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> = = * product). So, I'm puting the IS_INTERACTIVE there and ignore the = * portlint's coercing about it :) NO_CDROM or NO_PACKAGE are not = * needed, which is good :) = = As I say on the error logs page, you might not realize it but = IS_INTERACTIVE is actually stronger than all the NO_*s combined, since = I no longer have time to fetch and build IS_INTERACTIVE packages = manually. If you set IS_INTERACTIVE, you can pretty much assume the = distfile or package won't show up anywhere on the FTP site or CDROMs. Well, I did not realize, you can not even _fetch_ the interactive ports :-( = By the way, if it's only for the license, why don't you do it in the = REQ script? (Look at editors/e93). It is not only the license -- the script will extract the source code out from itself, only if the license is accepted. It can be hacked not to, but that's very likely to violate the license... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003300200.SAA03060>