Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:23:32 +0200
From:      JosC <bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Ports upgrade script
Message-ID:  <a8dfe6e8-dc62-6ecf-c7d1-d4902140f708@cloudzeeland.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20160416122425.b603d040.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <2daca22c-7719-0776-fbe8-3c37021298bf@cloudzeeland.nl> <20160416122425.b603d040.freebsd@edvax.de>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

In een bericht van 16-4-2016 12:24:
> Use either portsnap (binary upgrade) or svn (source upgrade) to keep 
> your ports collection current. In your specific case, I'd probably be 
> a good idea to entirely remove /usr/ports (or rename it) and start 
> with a fresh copy, to be obtained by _one_ of the two methods.
Thanks for your suggestion - what I don't understand is why my /user/src 
folder is emty.
Is that normal using portsnap?

BR, Jos Chrispijn



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a8dfe6e8-dc62-6ecf-c7d1-d4902140f708>