Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:03:40 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Sandra Kachelmann <s.kachelmann@googlemail.com> Cc: Martin Schweizer <schweizer.martin@gmail.com>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster Message-ID: <4C5C78AC.7030307@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=mreef7UDpGPwmnQ2Ascvq3Ca0w7RztBkJt6PK@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTinBJo0M-5fL=ATeY0KXnjA3O-7=TOLMF0X6dzdC@mail.gmail.com> <4C5BC280.1070805@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTinfXC%2B4J-ZVyUShqKNS3AgpXgwDtnMjVx=iSo9K@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimHgdWVpwP8r3rKXUe30acKvFdXs4xPpy9tgav-@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=mreef7UDpGPwmnQ2Ascvq3Ca0w7RztBkJt6PK@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/06/2010 05:44, Sandra Kachelmann wrote: > Thank you for your answer (and everyone else who replied). This is > exactly the reason why I keep going back to portupgrade. Default > OPTIONS almost always work for me - if not I go to the ports directory > and run make config then let the --batch option of portinstall deal > with everything. > > It would be extremely nice if there would be a --batch option that > would act like portupgrade. Now that you've been more specific about what you want, I have good news for you. :) In the current development version of portmaster I have revamped the -G option so that it acts more like BATCH=YES in the sense that it specifically skips all OPTIONS dialogs. Therefore you should be able to accomplish at least this part of what you want with -G alone, without using BATCH=YES at all. I plan to commit the update very soon, hopefully this weekend. I'm currently doing an extensive code review/whitespace realignment/etc. hth, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C5C78AC.7030307>