Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:23:15 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com> Cc: rik@inse.ru, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, babkin@users.sourceforge.net, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, ru@FreeBSD.org, gad@FreeBSD.org, des@des.no Subject: Re: "Chatty" config files in /etc Message-ID: <20060831192315.0412e836.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200608311258.OAA23536@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> References: <44F6D3B2.5080903@inse.ru> <200608311258.OAA23536@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:58:38 +0200 (MET DST) Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com> wrote: > Roman Kurakin: > >I suggest to make these files the way which would encourage peoples to keep > >example part, for example, under working part. Example will be still in the > >file, it will not bother admin, cause it do not cover essential part of > >the file, > >and will simplify merging. > > So, with the benefit of easing merging for committers, we end up with > two separate files for the end users (and sysadmins) - one "example > file" and one "tru config file". IMHO this sounds like complicating > matters. > > IMHO this whole problem and the discussion about it is a bit overkill. > Why not just keep it as it is? What is so fundamentally broken with the > current situation that we need important, POLA-breaking fixes? I think you missed the point completely. Please go back and re-read the discussion. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060831192315.0412e836.trhodes>