Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Aug 1996 13:22:09 +0300 (EET DST)
From:      Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee>
To:        Dave Hayes <dave@kachina.jetcafe.org>
Cc:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, jkh@time.cdrom.com, stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Sup-ing stable 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.91.960817131951.4816F-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee>
In-Reply-To: <199608161958.MAA28130@kachina.jetcafe.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 16 Aug 1996, Dave Hayes wrote:

> > You sure it doesn't say something like: FreeBSD SkyRsh.aac.dev.com
> > 2.1-STABLE FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 11 12:46:13 PDT 1996
> > root@SkyRsh.aac.dev.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/SKYRSH i386
> 
> Sure. But here's two machines I have loaded this on to:
> 
> FreeBSD avalon.jetcafe.org 2.1-STABLE FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE #0: Sun Aug
> 11 23:12:32 1996 dave@avalon.jetcafe.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/AVALON
> i386
> 
> FreeBSD elxr.jetcafe.org 2.1.5-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.1.5-RELEASE #0: Mon
> Jul 29 05:01:05 PDT 1996 dave@elxr.jetcafe.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/ELXR i386
> 
> Note the time differences, those are approximately when I sup'd the
> distributions. 
> 
> > Note, 2.1-STABLE, not 2.1-RELEASE.
> 
> I know. However, I agree with this 100%:
> 
> > I think there is enough confusion out there that the strings should be
> > changed to this:
> > TYPE="FreeBSD"
> > REVISION="2.1.5"
> > BRANCH="STABLE"
> 
> Also...
> 
> > It's still the ``STABLE'' branch, but PAST the 2.1.5 release tag...
> > ``STABLE'' == the cvs RELENG_2_1_0 tag, so I don't want to here the
> > cvs tag confustion again please...
> 
> Are people still patching this tree? I thought you guys wanted to
> freeze this code.

Freeze? You mean the code freeze before the release? It is long over. But 
the -stable brance is no more developed - *only* bug fixes go to it. 

	Sander

> ------
> Dave Hayes - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org 
> Freedom Knight of Usenet - http://www.jetcafe.org/~dave/usenet
> 
> The practice of study only too often makes people mere repeaters and 
> producers of cliches and sayings. Such study has been all but wasted.
> The product has taken the form in which we find it because it is an 
> unsuitable graft upon an unprepared basis.
> 
> 
> 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960817131951.4816F-100000>