Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 21:45:02 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG, dt@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/msdosfs msdosfs_vnops.c Message-ID: <199806101345.VAA06264@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 10 Jun 1998 22:09:31 %2B1000." <199806101209.WAA17030@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans wrote: [..] > Chflags doesn't have so much history beind not returning EOPNOTSUPP, but > EOPNOTSUPP is not mentioned in chflags.2 and EINVAL is documented as the > error for fchflags() on a socket. EOPNOTSUPP is what is returned by the "other" BSD's. I feel that there is a difference between giving a nonsense (invalid) argument, and the flags case where the backing fs can't support the valid request you've made. > Bruce Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806101345.VAA06264>