Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:03:40 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adam@vectors.cx> To: Gerard Samuel <gsam@trini0.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: cups-1.1.15.1 Message-ID: <20021007200340.GA81796@vectors.cx> In-Reply-To: <3DA1E638.7020104@trini0.org> References: <3DA11EFC.3080906@trini0.org> <20021007094546.GA22464@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <3DA18A0C.5040706@trini0.org> <20021007174905.GA77692@vectors.cx> <3DA1E638.7020104@trini0.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
all ghostscript-gnu-nox11 does is build ghostscript-gnu with WITHOUT_X11
defined.
any machine that isn't running X should have WITHOUT_X11 in
/etc/make.conf so there's never any ports headaches like these.
note that WITHOUT_X11 will work for most other X-optional ports, like
emacs, vim, cvsup, some image manipulation libs, etc.
-Adam
>> (10.07.2002 @ 1253 PST): Gerard Samuel said, in 1.2K: <<
> Im not sure. What would happen when the cups port wants to build the
> ghostscript x11 enabled port.
> Would it fail or build like its sibling ghostscript-gnu-nox11 port??
> Things to ponder on....
> Ive been documenting the steps Ive been taking to install cups.
> Maybe when I can confirm that I can print, Ill retry installing like how
> you suggested...
>
> Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >am i missing a larger question at hand, or would this not be solved by
> >putting:
> >WITHOUT_X11=yes
> >in /etc/make.conf and restarting the cups build?
>> end of "Re: FreeBSD Port: cups-1.1.15.1" from Gerard Samuel <<
--
"Oh good, my dog found the chainsaw."
-Lilo, "Lilo & Stitch"
Adam Weinberger
adam@vectors.cx
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021007200340.GA81796>