Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 19:40:18 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make WITH[OUT]_* more useful? Message-ID: <E5334597-4951-49A2-BFAA-2B4A6F8C28DD@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20140401051327.F20F958097@chaos.jnpr.net> References: <20140401051327.F20F958097@chaos.jnpr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01 Apr 2014, at 05:13 , Simon Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> wrote: > # NO_* takes precedence > # If both WITH_* and WITHOUT_* are defined, WITHOUT_ wins unless > # DOMINANT_* is set to "yes" > # Otherwise WITH_* and WITHOUT_* override the default. > and > MK_* can be pre-set without causing an error. ... > Thoughts? I am a it worried that we are increasing the number of prefixes again = rather than reducing it. I was hoping a while ago that NO_ would die. =97=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb ????????? ??? ??????? ??????: '??? ??? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????? ??? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ?? ????? ????', ????????? ?????????, "??? ????? ?? ?????", ?.???
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E5334597-4951-49A2-BFAA-2B4A6F8C28DD>