Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 19:50:26 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 216864] C11 conformance: cpow(), cpowf, and cpowl are missing Message-ID: <bug-216864-15@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216864 Bug ID: 216864 Summary: C11 conformance: cpow(), cpowf, and cpowl are missing Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Many People Priority: --- Component: standards Assignee: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Reporter: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu #include <complex.h> double complex foo(double complex a, double complex b) { return (cpow(a, b)); } float complex foof(float complex a, float complex b) { return (cpowf(a, b)); } long double complex fool(long double complex a, long double complex b) { return (cpowl(a, b)); } cc -c foo.c foo.c:7:12: warning: implicitly declaring library function 'cpow' with type '_Complex double (_Complex double, _Complex double)' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] return (cpow(a, b)); ^ foo.c:7:12: note: include the header <complex.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'cpow' foo.c:12:12: warning: implicitly declaring library function 'cpowf' with ty= pe '_Complex float (_Complex float, _Complex float)' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] return (cpowf(a, b)); ^ foo.c:12:12: note: include the header <complex.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'cpowf' foo.c:18:12: warning: implicitly declaring library function 'cpowl' with ty= pe '_Complex long double (_Complex long double, _Complex long double)' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] return (cpowl(a, b)); ^ foo.c:18:12: note: include the header <complex.h> or explicitly provide a declaration for 'cpowl' 3 warnings generated. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-216864-15>