Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:15:07 +0000 From: "imp (Warner Losh)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1711: Changes to the callout code to restore active semantics and also add a test-framework and test to validate thecallout code (and potentially for use by other tests). Message-ID: <3b02c5ed4b2e51f0d66edcc2bfc95549@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-vhk6ww63dvpj6egspuyt-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-vhk6ww63dvpj6egspuyt-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
imp added a comment. I agree that the kernel test framework should be done differently as well. I didn't realize the number of mechanical changes my request to use the macros produced :( INLINE COMMENTS sys/sys/callout_test.h:1 I'm not sure that the callout_test.h belong in sys. Seems like needless pollution. sys/sys/kern_testfrwk.h:1 Does this need to live in sys as well? REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1711 To: rrs, gnn, rwatson, adrian, sbruno, lstewart, imp, hselasky Cc: jhb, kostikbel, emaste, delphij, neel, erj, freebsd-net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3b02c5ed4b2e51f0d66edcc2bfc95549>