Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Apr 2000 14:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Brandon D. Valentine" <bandix@looksharp.net>
Cc:        Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Patchkits: Was :Re: SMP changes and breaking kld object module compatibility
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004251457020.24877-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004251641130.38092-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:

> The only way something like this is feasible is if the binaries
> themselves contain information about what version they are.  In other
> words some sort of a header in the binary which contains the RCS version
> number the binary was compiled from so that whatever method you were

You've never run ident(1), right? :)

Kris

----
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
    -- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004251457020.24877-100000>