Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 11:53:36 -0500 (EST) From: Stan Brown <stanb@netcom.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Networking) Subject: ipfw rule to allow traceroute to include 10.x.x.x addresses? Message-ID: <199912181653.IAA25336@netcom.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My cablemodem provider uses 10.x.x.x addreses internaly yo thire network. I don;t want to start a flamewar on whether this is a good or bad thing., It's totaly out of my control. However it is causing me problems. Wuth the default "simple" firwall ruleset, the repy packests from the hops are blocked. I am having a bit of a problem designing a rule to place in front of the non-routable network blocking rules to allow these packets back in. I am using natd to tarnslate all the hosts on my local network, so it should allow any host on my network to do a tracerout. The basic problem that i am having is withe the protocal type. Using ip, or icpm seems to generate an error messae when I try to insert the rule. Any sugestions? -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 404-996-6955 Factory Automation Systems Atlanta Ga. -- Look, look, see Windows 95. Buy, lemmings, buy! Pay no attention to that cliff ahead... Henry Spencer (c) 1998 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912181653.IAA25336>