Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:04:38 -0200 From: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> To: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: how to deal with unzip on -CURRENT? Message-ID: <e71790db1001211804q7d14066bu5bac2864fb57a0b2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20100120230549.GA16980@darklight.org.ru> References: <4B578709.7010508@FreeBSD.org> <20100120230549.GA16980@darklight.org.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:05 PM, Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:43:21PM +0100, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've got a PR (ports/142091), which made me think about the base >> version of unzip that was recently enabled in HEAD. I think that the >> current version of that port is correct and just UNZIP_CMD should be >> set to the base version on -CURRENT in bsd.port.mk. Or do I have to >> enforce ports unzip as a dependency by full path? Were there similar >> issues? Is there a conventional/preferred solution for this? >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Gabor Kovesdan >> FreeBSD Volunteer >> >> EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org >> WEB: =A0 http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org > > I think it was fixed in bsd.port.mk 1.633: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk.diff?r1=3D1.63= 2;r2=3D1.633 I think it also solves ports/141795.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e71790db1001211804q7d14066bu5bac2864fb57a0b2>