Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Sep 2002 21:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@attbi.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Comments on new Linux threading implementation?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0209302109100.84654-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020930225234.A22216@attbi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Craig Rodrigues wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I saw this post on the Linux kernel mailing list which
> describes a major re-write of the POSIX threads implementation
> on Linux:
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0209.2/1075.html
> 
> 
> How does this stuff under Linux compare to the scheduler
> activation type work going on under FreeBSD
> ( http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/threads/ )?

What they are doing is a small improvement over the previous
linuxthreads implementation. It's a valid path and we'll see how it
works out... 

> 
> Thanks.
> -- 
> Craig Rodrigues        
> http://www.gis.net/~craigr    
> rodrigc@attbi.com
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0209302109100.84654-100000>