Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Apr 1999 20:06:19 -0500 (EST)
From:      Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net>
To:        Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
Cc:        Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Switching to EGCS on Saturday (PST)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9904032002290.498-100000@picnic.mat.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9904031853330.14373-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Steve Price wrote:

> On Sat, 3 Apr 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> 
> # > Something that someone playing with bleeding edge bits should
> # > be willing to do, IMHO.
> # 
> # That's ridiculous. There's substantial work ongoing in 4.0 with enough
> # people involved that changing things around for the hell of it and not
> # sticking to broadcast times is just plain stupid. It's called 'dufus
> # engineering', or 'freshman humour' or some such. Just because it's
> # so-called 'bleeding edge' doesn't mean you can just integrate any old crap
> # and just say "well- it's bleeding edge". Harumph.
> 
> We are not changing it for the hell of it.  From what I gather
> David already has things ready and is just waiting for Sunday
> to come to commit the changes.  Committing them now gives much
> of the people who will work to fix things that get broken a
> whole day more this weekend to work on them.  This isn't 'dufus
> engineering' it is called advancing the state-of-the-art.  It
> has been a long time coming and needs to be done, sooner than
> later.
> 
> Just because the compiler changes doesn't mean development on
> the 4.0 branch have to stop.  We need to get this change in the
> hands of as many people as we can so that we can work out any
> remaining hitches.  Waiting another 24 hours == wasting another
> 24 hours, IMHO.

I don't like to disagree with you, Matthew, but the cvsup line to get
what you need is pretty simple.  This thing needs to get tested, asap,
and the weekend is a better time for it.  Your argument is basically
"do what you said" ... the rest, likening it to freshman antics, is
emotionalism.  We have a good reason to push ahead here, and an easy
recovery path.  Some folks might get surprised, but that seems like a
small thing, actually, because nearly all of them are reading this.

----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey                 | Interests include any kind of voice or data 
chuckr@glue.umd.edu         | communications topic, C programming, and Unix.
213 Lakeside Drive Apt T-1  |
Greenbelt, MD 20770         | I run picnic (FreeBSD-current)
(301) 220-2114              | and jaunt (Solaris7).
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------






To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9904032002290.498-100000>