Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 22:24:37 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Dan Kegel <dank@alumni.caltech.edu>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kqueue microbenchmark results Message-ID: <3A30E115.CF7C76E8@newsguy.com> References: <20001024225637.A54554@prism.flugsvamp.com> <39F6655A.353FD236@alumni.caltech.edu> <20001025115457.X28123@fw.wintelcom.net> <20001025170117.C87091@prism.flugsvamp.com> <20001207154925.A25785@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Malone wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:01:17PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > I'd love to do that, but am not quite sure how I'd go about it. > > If you read the l-k mailing list, you'll see Linus calling kqueue > > "overengineered", and what he is proposing is something that is > > definitely not well thought out. > > Maybe Alexander Viro could help? He often follows what's happening > in the BSD world and seems to do lots of good VFS type work in the > Linux world. Matt Dillon recently worked with him on the file > discriptor locking patches he committed. Why is it that I get the feeling more and more nowadays that Linus is suffering from a worsening case of NIH when it comes to things originated on BSD? -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org "The bronze landed last, which canceled that method of impartial choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A30E115.CF7C76E8>