Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 15:34:37 -0230 From: Jonathan Anderson <jonathan@FreeBSD.org> To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: There is currently no usable release of FreeBSD. Message-ID: <538F5FB5.9060008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <332D72DF-2225-40E2-B246-0786181AAB51@tony.li> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406040944570.2120@kozubik.com> <332D72DF-2225-40E2-B246-0786181AAB51@tony.li>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Li wrote: > What’s the problem with using ‘legacy’? Is the problem actually that we're using the term "legacy", which some vendors use to mean "unsupported"? Perhaps we ought to say: Supported releases: Latest: 10.0 Also supported: 9.2, 8.4 or something more explicit about branch lifetimes (in keeping with the new policy): Supported branches: 10.x - supported until x/y/zz, current release 10.0 9.x - supported until x/y/zz, current release 9.2 8.x - supported until x/y/zz, current release 8.4 ? Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?538F5FB5.9060008>