Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:31:33 -0700
From:      "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@gmail.com>
To:        Modulok <modulok@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bizzare routing table entry.
Message-ID:  <8cb6106e0708071331v47c866beh2296110c75a846c2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <64c038660708071210w1950ccccwda1bb8464587d1de@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <64c038660708071210w1950ccccwda1bb8464587d1de@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> root# route delete 0&0xc0a80132
>
>   [1] 37343
>   route: writing to routing socket: No such process
>   delete net 0: not in table
>   0xc0a80132: Command not found.
>   [1]  + Exit 1                        route delete 0

> root# route delete 0&0xc0a80132
>
>   [1] 37343
>   route: writing to routing socket: No such process
>   delete net 0: not in table
>   0xc0a80132: Command not found.
>   [1]  + Exit 1                        route delete 0

I've no idea whether that is a valid route or not, but the reason
you're getting that funkiness is that the shell is eating the & and
thinks you are sending the route process to the background. Try:

route delete '0&0xc0a80132'

And see if it lets you remove the entry.

Josh



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8cb6106e0708071331v47c866beh2296110c75a846c2>