Date: 06 May 2002 12:23:36 -0700 From: Max Okumoto <okumoto@ucsd.edu> To: Antoine Beaupre <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> Cc: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org>, libh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: util vs tools Message-ID: <hfadrdxepz.fsf@multivac.sdsc.edu> In-Reply-To: Antoine Beaupre's message of "Mon, 6 May 2002 13:49:43 -0400" References: <A586394A-6119-11D6-B538-0050E4A0BB3F@anarcat.ath.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You guys are right. We should only have one. It was just
habit from a previous project where they seperated scripts
from tools which were build from src. I will move all my stuff
into tools. I would also like to move find_classes_descriptions.pl
into tools.
Max Okumoto
Antoine Beaupre <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> writes:
> Well, as far as I can remember, both didn't exist until recently.
>
> A.
>
> Le Lundi 6 mai 2002, à 01:39 , Jordan Hubbard a écrit :
>
> > Probably historical - I don't see any problem with consolidating them.
> >
> >> Why have a util *AND* tools directory?
> >>
> >> Seems to me the utils in there should be both in tools *or* util. I'd
> >> rather have them in tools.
> >>
> >> A.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hfadrdxepz.fsf>