Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 08:00:43 -0500 From: Baho Utot <baho-utot@columbus.rr.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth? Message-ID: <ca68bd2a-6872-4d2b-872c-9f058efd85ed@columbus.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <7f654c63-dd5d-e54f-a8cf-ff1d18128d94@vishwin.info> References: <CAN6yY1ujLFdKpuG4Rxz%2Bfww9gAxTBaY14iCB7RFTkh-oVB1%2B9A@mail.gmail.com> <BN6PR2001MB1730A16025654AB7C452111B80390@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <CAOc73CD9VnLKv8-jBNW1Uj05LnEFh6kkZFKNAxp-EG9YO_AUxA@mail.gmail.com> <1512211220.79413.1.camel@yandex.com> <BN6PR2001MB17309152A0FC3776781AB53B803E0@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> <7f654c63-dd5d-e54f-a8cf-ff1d18128d94@vishwin.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/02/17 07:23, Charlie Li wrote: > On 02/12/2017 06:53, Carmel NY wrote: >> Well, I certainly have no intention of installing and then learning how to use >> an industrial sized solution line poudriere for a relatively small home network. >> > poudriere is not industrial-sized at all. Sure, it has many features > that I don't exactly use, but it's certainly not industrial-sized. I had > the same impression of a monstrosity before I started using it myself, > on my *laptop* of all things. >> Looking back at other port management utilities like "portmanager", >> "portmaster", "portupgrade" and now "synth", The FreeBSD team has done a >> pretty good job of obfuscating and rendering them impotent. Which brings me >> to what happens if I do embrace "poudriere". How long before that becomes >> history also? >> > portmgr officially maintains and promotes poudriere. It's not going > anywhere until they say it is. > Sorry tired of playing games, leaving FreeBSD as we speak
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ca68bd2a-6872-4d2b-872c-9f058efd85ed>