Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 04:23:29 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, <current@FreeBSD.org>, Anders Andersson <anders@sanyusan.se>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: make includes Message-ID: <20020516041026.O1047-100000@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20020515092629.C81859@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 15 May 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > Almost correct. For the record and future ports: > [jhb wrote] > > It's useful for a new arch that doesn't have make world yet. When I would > > update world on my sparc before gcc was bmake'd it went something like this: > > sudo make hierarchy > > > > sudo make includes > > > sudo make libraries What John wants is really these 2 steps. Includes and libraries form a usable subsset of the world, so it would be reasonable to have an end-user target for it. Hwowever, building that target robustly would involve a lot more than the above. All the tools for building the libraries would have to be built, and that wouldn't work in this case. > > > make obj && make depend && make > > > sudo make install > > > > To build and install a new world. Several other steps are missing. Mainly "make obj" before "make libraries". "make obj" is now necessary before "make includes". Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020516041026.O1047-100000>