Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:20:44 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Pechter <pechter@pechter.dyndns.org> To: John Sconiers <jrs@enteract.com> Cc: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sparc Port -- sounds good to me Message-ID: <200001191720.MAA04345@bg-tc-ppp596.monmouth.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000119100802.86115A-100000@shell-2.enteract.com> from John Sconiers at "Jan 19, 2000 10:12:06 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Great...
> > Should we start with OpenBSD and begin with the userland stuff first
> > to see how much ports over easily?
> > Oops... We've got even more hardware. I forgot the ELC I've got as well...
>
> Quick question....shouldn't we start with NetBSD.....I'm under the
> impression that OpenBSD's port _IS_ NetBSD's port with a few bug fixes and
> stronger security and starting from NetBSD would be easier?? I may be
> wrong.
>
> JOHN
Pick one...
The one advantage of OpenBSD is the packages system's already there.
I've got CDROMS from both. Anyone have any preferences?
(I also volunteer my Vax for the Vax port... and a MacII for the Mac
port)
FreeBSD-VAX sounds pretty good...)
FreeBSD-VAX. Good Unix... done s_l_o_w.
Bill
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bpechter@monmouth.com|pechter@pechter.dyndns.org|pechter@pechter.bsdonline.org
Three things never anger: First, the one who runs your DEC,
The one who does Field Service and the one who signs your check.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001191720.MAA04345>