Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:06:13 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: glabel for ufs: size check is overzealous? Message-ID: <49EF1645.70704@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <gsl446$vae$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <49EDCA21.70908@icyb.net.ua> <gskrld$vo0$1@ger.gmane.org> <49EDF80F.3070105@icyb.net.ua> <gsl446$vae$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 21/04/2009 21:43 Ivan Voras said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I don't see why it should and - no, it actually does not. >> fsck checks only filesystem's internal consistency, it doesn't check media size, etc. > > Well yes, if the number of blocks is really incorrect it should be > visible from the arrangement of the metadata but still - that makes the > field almost useless doesn't it? How do you mean? The field tells the filesystem size, how it can be useless? -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49EF1645.70704>