Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:31:29 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki <mdcki@gmx.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org> Cc: Freebsd Current <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) Message-ID: <3F70ADA1.6020907@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <3F6FCD7E.4070301@freebsd.org> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309221420290.17698-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <3F6FCD7E.4070301@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long wrote: > I'm perfectly happy to support the libkse->libpthread switch, and I'm > perfectly happy to support making libpthread be the default threading > library. But, I strongly believe that we need to also treat -pthread > sanely. You have to decide what the therading lib should be indeed. However recent expirence shows that a 1:n model seems to be the one the world over you is gearing around: Linux never did anything else. Windows anyway. Solaris switched from n:m to 1:n on the step between version 8 and 9.... Having two of them isn't the solution for me as a developer since I'm simply not interresed in debugging both cases.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F70ADA1.6020907>