Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:26:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com Cc: garbanzo@hooked.net, mike@smith.net.au, entropy@compufit.at, wwoods@cybcon.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc 2.8 Message-ID: <199808230326.WAA07414@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <20089.903839626@brown.pfcs.com> (message from Harlan Stenn on Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:33:46 -0400) References: <20089.903839626@brown.pfcs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> While it's been several months since I last did a performance > comparison between TenDRA and gcc/egcs, I remember that the > TenDRA-compiled code was significantly slower than the code produced > by gcc or egcs. I've got most of a test suite I hacked together. Mostly benchmark type stuff, but it's better than nothing. It compares both compiler speed and emitted code speed. If there is significant interest, I can rerun it against various compilers (send me URLs or ports names) and post the results. Best, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808230326.WAA07414>