Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:49:34 +0200
From:      Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Default ssh protocol in -STABLE [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD-STABLE now has OpenSSH 3.4p1]
Message-ID:  <20020705134934.A40046@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
In-Reply-To: <xzphejepfd7.fsf_-_@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:45:56PM %2B0200
References:  <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020705073043.01c52198@192.168.0.12> <xzphejepfd7.fsf_-_@flood.ping.uio.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 2002-07-05, Dag-Erling Smorgrav écrivait :

> What do people think about this?  Keep 2,1 or revert to 1,2?

Since the version change is going to suprise people anyway, I'd say let
us do it all the way and switch to protocol 2,1. It is more than time
to phase out protocol 1.

-- 
    Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020705134934.A40046>