Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:12:21 -0800 From: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> To: Alistair Sutton <alistair.sutton@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Hodgins <chodgins@cis.strath.ac.uk> Subject: Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade? Message-ID: <200503131612.22422.ringworm01@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <fa8f059505031316065f3b5373@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050313200543.B290F4BE6D@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> <fa8f059505031316065f3b5373@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday 13 March 2005 04:06 pm, Alistair Sutton wrote: > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:52:25 +0000, Chris Hodgins > > <chodgins@cis.strath.ac.uk> wrote: > > Excellent. Does it leave packages for everything or is just > > thunderbird that does this? > > It will create packages for every port that it updates and place them > under the usual /usr/ports/packages structure. > > Al I should mention Al here provided the code to add an interactive update option to portmanager. With version 0.2.9_3 portmanager-ui will let you make Y/N decisions on which ports to update. I've just submitted it to FreeBSD so should be in the Tree sometime in the next 24 hours. -Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503131612.22422.ringworm01>