Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:22:07 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/deb2targz Makefile ports/devel/cvsspam Makefile ports/dns/sshfp Makefile ports/dns/vizone Makefile ports/games/textmaze Makefile ports/mail/delatt Makefile ports/misc/shuffle-db Makefile ports/sysutils/areca-cli Makefile ... Message-ID: <20090331162207.GC49753@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <200903301508.n2UF8V0S004945@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200903301508.n2UF8V0S004945@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Emanuel Haupt (ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > Modified files: > archivers/deb2targz Makefile > devel/cvsspam Makefile > dns/sshfp Makefile > dns/vizone Makefile > games/textmaze Makefile > mail/delatt Makefile > misc/shuffle-db Makefile > sysutils/areca-cli Makefile > sysutils/rej Makefile > textproc/colordiff Makefile > www/bannerfilter Makefile > www/linklint Makefile > x11-themes/audacious-skins Makefile > x11-themes/irssi-themes Makefile > Log: > Remove MAKE_JOBS_SAFE, port has no build target. Do we not mark such port as MAKE_JOBS_SAFE? I mean, if there's no build target they really are safe, and marking them as such will help to identify yet unmarked/untested ports. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090331162207.GC49753>