Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:32:26 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Standard sbc and pcm support in GENERIC kernel? Message-ID: <200403062132.29846.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200403062012.VAA15078@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> References: <200403062012.VAA15078@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_dVjSApiGTxu4jIh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 06 March 2004 21:12, Helge Oldach wrote: > BTW, why not make PNPBIOS on by default in 4-STABLE? Is this a "danger > of breaking things, aka POLA violation" against "prepare for 5.x > upgrade" case? I don't really have experience to support this (I upgraded a 4.4 box to=20 5.0-CURRENT once), but I think upgrading 4.x boxes to 5.x from source is=20 pretty messy anyway, just thinking of all the renamed/moved/removed=20 binaries... but maybe someone has already prepared a script to help cleanin= g=20 a freshly upgrading system? I'd definitely be interested in such a thing. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_dVjSApiGTxu4jIh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBASjVdXhc68WspdLARAnc0AJ9ZNk9/anujas4XDZN2ym1ImWXmTgCgo/cD OfK5UOmJxKkxLBTLKBx8Icg= =qts7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_dVjSApiGTxu4jIh--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403062132.29846.michaelnottebrock>