Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 02:43:26 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213932] security/gnupg1 heinous-gnu-extensions fail with gcc5 Message-ID: <bug-213932-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213932 Bug ID: 213932 Summary: security/gnupg1 heinous-gnu-extensions fail with gcc5 Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: adamw@FreeBSD.org Reporter: dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au Flags: maintainer-feedback?(adamw@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: adamw@FreeBSD.org If the /usr/ports/base/gcc didn't create gcc5.4.0, I wouldn't raise this bu= g.=20 But as I've built gcc5 from lang/gcc5 and build most ports this way, its wo= rth mentioning that gnupg1 fails to build. The logic of the conditional probab= ly needs refining, but I just wanted to jump over this "bug".=20=20 --- /usr/ports/security/gnupg1/Makefile (revision 424968) +++ /usr/ports/security/gnupg1/Makefile (working copy) @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ .include <bsd.port.options.mk> -.if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "i386" && (${CC} =3D=3D "clang" || ${OSVERSION} >=3D 10= 00024) +.if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "i386" && ${CC} =3D=3D "clang" CFLAGS+=3D -fheinous-gnu-extensions .endif FYI: In my case, # make -VCC -Vcc gcc5 /usr/local/libexec/ccache/gcc5 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213932-13>