Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:02:49 -0600 From: "Donald J. O'Neill" <donaldjoneill@gmail.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: printing from acroread 7 Message-ID: <200603300602.50036.donaldjoneill@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060330081959.2ff8q1txc0gk0os8@netchild.homeip.net> References: <20060328210920.F1D4C29560@mail.bitblocks.com> <200603290812.16611.donaldjoneill@gmail.com> <20060330081959.2ff8q1txc0gk0os8@netchild.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 30 March 2006 00:19, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > "Donald J. O'Neill" <donaldjoneill@gmail.com> wrote: > > version. I finally ended up with everything I could find, put it in > > distfiles, also in distfiles/acroread and as far as I can tell, I > > cannot get past the message "this is an interactive port" error1 - > > not exactly the message but it gives you the idea. I then blew > > everything off and started over, same thing. I think there is a > > document that I need to agree to that is just not there, I know it > > used to be for older versions. > > Did you tried to just go into print/acroread7 and type "make"? Do you > have set BATCH somewhere (this is the reason why you get this > message, remove it and it will present a text you have to read and > agree to)? > > Bye, > Alexander. Yes, BATCH=yes was in /etc/make.conf. I commented it out last night and reran 'make install' in /print/acroread7. It went through just like it's supposed to. This is the one time that BATCH didn't do me any favors. I'll be remembering from now on to comment it out if I come across a file that says it's interactive. Thank you. Don
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603300602.50036.donaldjoneill>