Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:47:54 -0800 (PST)
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
To: eischen@vigrid.com
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pthread_{suspend,resume}_np broken?
Message-ID: <200003010447.UAA74251@vashon.polstra.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000229224700.20669A@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000229224700.20669A@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000229224700.20669A@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote: > On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, John Polstra wrote: > > > Shouldn't the test against PS_SUSPENDED be "==" instead of "!="? > > Yes, it should be "==" instead of "!=". > > Go ahead and fix it if you want :-) Thanks. I'll ask Jordan if I may commit the fix. What about the other part of my question? I still don't understand why in my test program pthread_suspend_np() isn't suspending the thread. I think it's a separate bug from the pthread_resume_np() bug. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003010447.UAA74251>