Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 20:10:35 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r326675 - head/irc/bitchx Message-ID: <20130909011035.GA3361@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <522B8DA8.1010208@FreeBSD.org> References: <201309071818.r87IIHvB079661@svn.freebsd.org> <522B8DA8.1010208@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 07, 2013 at 03:33:44PM -0500, Bryan Drewery wrote: > I was thinking of adding 2 names into MAINTAINER on a port and seeing > what fallout ensues. Traditionally I had shied away from it due to not knowing how the following would react: portbuild; portsmon; freshports. But I'm not prepared to fight that battle anymore. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130909011035.GA3361>