Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:06:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Leon Me??ner <l.messner@physik.tu-berlin.de>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mikolaj Golub <to.my.trociny@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Re: Re: freeBSD nullfs together with nfs and "silly rename" Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1006121904160.28836@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <20100612150915.GN13238@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20100606144443.GA50876@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> <8639wsk4t1.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <20100612141549.GM13238@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1006121112150.4460@muncher.cs.uoguelph.ca> <20100612150915.GN13238@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Yes, I hoped that Mikolaj ends up with something similar :). Please note > that this is racy, since we cannot know why usecount is greater then 1. > This might cause the silly rename to kick in some time where it should > not, but the race is rare. > I'd say that having silly rename happen once in a while for unlink when it doesn't have to happen is better than having the file deleted on the server while it is still open on the client. rick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.63.1006121904160.28836>