Date: Sun, 03 May 1998 14:30:51 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: kpielorz@tdx.co.uk (Karl Pielorz), tlambert@primenet.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM changes broke SYSVSHM? Message-ID: <199805032130.OAA02725@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 04 May 1998 07:00:14 %2B1000." <199805032100.HAA14880@cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, we have many that complain that by itself is not a problem what is a problem is to increase the productivity level so perhaps at this stage is best to break up into small functional components where a new breed of hackers can thrive . We are already heading in that direction : Terry's web page, Julian's web page , the Bt848 driver project, etc... Cheers, Amancio > Karl Pielorz wrote: > > Very true, but it's still amazing the amount of people I see who say "I'm > > running 3.0 on our [production] server...", very scary ;-) > > This is NOT the case. I was referring to normal development work on > -current. People complain about not having better thread support. > People complain about developers not testing things before committing > them. Well if the committers themselves can't run -current, what do > they do? Commit anyway? Delay commits for a month? > > -- > John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org http://www.cimlogic.com.au/ > CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805032130.OAA02725>