Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 01:26:16 -0800 (PST) From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jmz@cabri.obs-besancon.fr Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/latex/scripts configure ports/print/latex Makefile Message-ID: <199702260926.BAA00869@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <9702260208.AA27039@cabri.obs-besancon.fr> (message from Jean-Marc Zucconi on Wed, 26 Feb 97 03:08:11 %2B0100)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* No this is my fault :-(. I should always install/test my ports in * empty directories.... You don't have to go that far, just pkg_delete the old one first. As long as the old PLIST is correct (and if pkg_delete spits out errors, you should fix that anyway :), that would blow away everything. * I don't know if many people use the tex/latex port. Of course, if * nobody use it, we can remove it. On the other hand there is a big * difference in size (because tetex has a lot of stuff). Yeah. I'm not about to suggest removing tex/latex now (for starters, teTeX doesn't build right now), but I keep getting questions about "which tex port should I use?" Well now that mltex and latex209 are gone, I think it's down to a manageable size. :) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702260926.BAA00869>