Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 15:11:25 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default ssh protocol in -STABLE [was: HEADS UP: FreeBSD-STABLE now has OpenSSH 3.4p1] Message-ID: <20020705121125.GF494@straylight.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <20020705134934.A40046@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <20020705073634.GA64656@sunbay.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20020705073043.01c52198@192.168.0.12> <xzphejepfd7.fsf_-_@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020705134934.A40046@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:49:34PM +0200, Thomas Quinot wrote: > Le 2002-07-05, Dag-Erling Smorgrav ?crivait : >=20 > > What do people think about this? Keep 2,1 or revert to 1,2? >=20 > Since the version change is going to suprise people anyway, I'd say let > us do it all the way and switch to protocol 2,1. It is more than time > to phase out protocol 1. Seconded. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential? --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9JYzt7Ri2jRYZRVMRAjM5AKDAK+b2j/F92l93TOPi9wZLyJk7jQCdE9MD mA0l9ddod1gkAPH5KH/V4nU= =VfvN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020705121125.GF494>